MiCA License Cost: Fees, Capital and the Security Budget
Quick answer. Application fees range from €5,000 per service in Cyprus to an hourly fee capped at €100,000 in the Netherlands. Capital: €50,000 to €150,000, or a quarter of fixed overheads if higher. Advisers, staff and security testing add more.
Video transcript
MiCA sets no EU-wide license fee. Each regulator sets its own, and the only number MiCA fixes is capital.
Only two of the five cost lines are published. Budget all five: regulator fees, capital, the application file, people, and ICT and security.
Cyprus charges five to thirty thousand euros per service. The Netherlands bills two hundred euros an hour, capped at one hundred thousand.
Capital is the higher of your class minimum or a quarter of fixed overheads. A Class 2 firm projecting one million euros of overheads needs two hundred fifty thousand euros.
The ICT section describes systems you already run: DORA technical documentation, critical vendor contracts, and incident procedures. If available, add a third-party audit, ideally with pentests and smart contract code review.
No regulator prices this. Software vendor Crassula estimates twenty to sixty thousand euros for a pentest and ICT audit. After authorization, DORA requires testing critical systems at least yearly.
Crassula puts a Class 2 or 3 firm's first year at three hundred fifty to nine hundred thousand euros all-in, capital included.
To cut cost, license only what you will run. Banks and investment firms may notify instead. File complete, and scope the audit to critical systems.
Guardian writes the ICT and security sections of your file and closes every pentest with a retest. Read the full article, or talk to Guardian.
MiCA sets no EU-wide authorization fee. Each national authority sets its own, and the published schedules differ widely.
Capital is the one number MiCA fixes. Advisers, staff, systems and security depend on your services and how you build.
Here is what regulators publish, what one vendor estimates, and where the security budget goes.
This article explains the technical and security side of MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) and DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) for CASP authorization. It is not legal advice; confirm how it applies to you with counsel.
The Cost Components
- Regulator fees: an application fee, then yearly supervision fees.
- Capital: prudential safeguards held at all times (Article 67).
- The file: Article 62(2) lists 19 items, including governance and ICT documentation.
- People: a management body of good repute and skill (Article 68(1)), and qualified staff (Article 68(5)).
- ICT and security: systems built to DORA, tested, with vendors under contract (Article 68(7), (8)).
Only the first two come with published numbers.
Regulator Fees by Country
These are the schedules we could read on regulators' own sites. Some give a method rather than a figure.
| Authority | Application fee | Yearly fee |
|---|---|---|
| Malta (MFSA) | €10,000, €20,000 or €25,000 by class | €10,000 to €50,000 by class, plus per-service and volume charges |
| Cyprus (CySEC) | Per service, added up: €5,000 to €30,000 each | Fixed per service, plus a turnover surcharge; capped at €500,000 |
| Netherlands (AFM) | €200 an hour, capped at €100,000 | €8,000 base, plus turnover and per-service charges |
| Sweden (FI) | Set by estimated processing time | Linked to balance sheet; at least SEK 150,000 |
| Germany (BaFin) | Set by time spent; due even if withdrawn or rejected | Not stated on BaFin's CASP page |
The AFM adds €700 per person for the integrity test and €2,900 per person for the suitability test. The Dutch central bank, DNB, charges its own yearly levy on top.
Fees are not refundable in Malta. BaFin charges even when an application is withdrawn or rejected.
A worked example
Take a CASP offering custody, both kinds of exchange and transfers. That is Class 2. Below is our arithmetic from the two published schedules.
| Fee | Malta | Cyprus |
|---|---|---|
| Application | €20,000 | €25,000 |
| Yearly, fixed | €33,000 (€25,000 plus €2,000 per service) | €25,000 |
| Yearly, variable | 0.05% of transaction volume, capped at €250,000 | Surcharge once turnover passes €500,000 |
Capital Requirements
MiCA Article 67 requires prudential safeguards at all times, equal to the higher of:
- the permanent minimum for your class (Annex IV);
- one quarter of last year's fixed overheads, reviewed yearly.
| Class | Adds these services | Minimum |
|---|---|---|
| Class 1 | Execution, placing, transfers, order transmission, advice, portfolio management | €50,000 |
| Class 2 | Custody; exchange for funds or other crypto-assets | €125,000 |
| Class 3 | Operating a trading platform | €150,000 |
New firms use the projected fixed overheads in their application (Article 67(2)). A Class 2 firm projecting €1 million of fixed overheads needs €250,000, not €125,000.
Safeguards can be own funds, an insurance policy or comparable guarantee, or a mix (Article 67(4)). Capital is not a fee, but you hold it for as long as you operate.
EMT payments raise the floor. The EBA advises applying MiCA and PSD2 capital cumulatively: its example, a Class 2 custodian that also executes payment transactions, needs €250,000 (EBA/Op/2025/08).
The Security and ICT Line
The ICT section of the file describes systems you must already run. RTS 2025/305 Article 9 asks for:
- Technical documentation of ICT systems, DLT infrastructure and security arrangements built for DORA.
- Critical ICT services from third parties, with contracts, mapped to MiCA Article 73 and DORA Chapter V.
- Security and incident management procedures.
- If available, a third-party cybersecurity audit, ideally with black, grey and white box pentests.
- Within that audit, ideally, a source code review of any smart contracts you use or develop.
Authorization does not close this line. Under DORA, critical systems need appropriate tests at least yearly (Article 24(6)), and detection must be in place and tested (Article 10).
What it costs
No regulator publishes a figure. Crassula, a white-label banking software vendor, estimates €20,000 to €60,000 for a pentest and ICT audit.
For public price points, see what a Web3 pentest costs.
What drives it
- Surface: web and mobile apps, APIs, admin tools, cloud and signing systems.
- Smart contracts: each one you use or develop adds source code review.
- Custody model: your own signing stack means more to test than a custody partner.
- Vendors: each critical provider needs due diligence, DORA contract terms and an exit plan.
- Retests: every finding fixed and the fix validated (DORA Article 24(5)).
- TLPT: a threat-led test every 3 years, if your authority identifies you (Article 26).
For the full control list, see our MiCA compliance checklist. For how the two texts split the work, see MiCA and DORA.
Advisers, Staff and Totals
Advisers and staff have no published price. These are Crassula's estimates, updated 9 October 2026:
| Item | Crassula's estimate |
|---|---|
| Legal counsel for the application | €40,000 to €150,000 |
| Policies and documentation | €25,000 to €80,000 |
| Compliance officer or MLRO, year one | €60,000 to €120,000 |
| Technology stack, year one | €150,000 to €600,000 to build, or €5,000 to €30,000 a month white-label |
| First year all-in, Class 2 or 3 | €350,000 to €900,000, including €125,000 to €150,000 of capital |
Crassula sells white-label banking software with crypto modules, so read its technology line with that in mind.
Time costs money too. Authorities have 25 working days to check completeness, then 40 working days from a complete file to decide (Article 63).
Ways to Reduce Cost
- License only what you will run. Your services set your capital, and in Malta and Cyprus your fee.
- Use a license you hold. Banks, investment firms and some other regulated firms may notify under Article 60 instead.
- Notification is cheaper. The AFM caps it at €50,000; FI charges SEK 25,500.
- Do not resend documents. Authorities may not ask for current information already filed for an e-money, MiFID II or PSD2 license (Article 62(4)).
- File complete. Authorities may refuse to review a file still incomplete after their deadline (Article 63(3)).
- Scope the audit to critical systems. Those are the systems DORA tests every year.
- Write vendor terms once, to meet MiCA Article 73 and DORA Article 30 together.
How Guardian Helps
Guardian's Regulatory & Compliance team writes the ICT, security, custody and continuity sections of an authorization file from the system as built.
Its gap assessment lists each provision with the control that meets it and the evidence that proves it. Gaps are ordered by what blocks authorization.
Guardian's audit reports close with a fix review, and Guardian maps them to RTS 2025/305 Article 9. Its pentests close with a retest.
Guardian does not publish pentest prices; it scopes from your system. Vanguard returns half the package cost as credits toward Guardian's offchain assessments.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a MiCA license cost?
Application fees range from €5,000 per service (Cyprus) to an hourly fee capped at €100,000 (Netherlands). Capital starts at €50,000. Software vendor Crassula estimates €350,000 to €900,000 for a Class 2 or 3 CASP's first year, capital included.
How long does MiCA authorization take?
Authorities have 25 working days to check an application is complete, then 40 working days from a complete file to decide (MiCA Article 63). Sweden's FI says it can add 20 working days if a file needs supplementing.
Is the MiCA capital requirement a fee?
No. It is a prudential safeguard you hold at all times, as own funds, insurance or both. It is the higher of your class minimum (€50,000 to €150,000) and a quarter of last year's fixed overheads.
What does a MiCA license cost each year?
Supervision fees are set nationally: €10,000 to €50,000 by class in Malta plus per-service and volume charges, and at least SEK 150,000 in Sweden. Add DORA's yearly tests of critical systems, staff and audits.
Sources
- Publications Office of the EU: Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA), Official Journal (9 June 2023)
- Publications Office of the EU: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/305, RTS on CASP authorization applications (31 March 2025)
- Publications Office of the EU: Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Official Journal (27 December 2022)
- Laws of Malta: Markets in Crypto-Assets Act (Fees) Regulations, S.L. 647.01, Legal Notice 295 of 2024 (5 November 2024)
- CySEC: Policy Statement PS-03-2024 on fees payable by entities under MiCAR (13 December 2024)
- AFM: Cost of licensing or notification (accessed 5 November 2026)
- Staatscourant: Regeling bekostiging financieel toezicht 2026, Stcrt. 2026, 20792 (15 June 2026)
- Finansinspektionen: Cryptoasset services, authorization (reviewed 19 November 2025)
- BaFin: Cryptoasset services (accessed 5 November 2026)
- EBA: Opinion on the interplay between PSD2 and MiCA, EBA/Op/2025/08 (10 June 2025)
- Crassula: MiCA CASP License 2026 guide (updated 9 October 2026)
- Guardian: Blockchain Penetration Testing Cost: Web3 Pentest Prices
- Guardian: Regulatory & Compliance Assessments
Budget the security line of your MiCA file
Guardian writes the ICT and security sections of your application and runs the audits and pentests behind them.