We manage your security to weather the AI storm →

← Resource Hub

Crypto Hacks Database: Every Major Exploit Since 2025

By Daniel Gelfand Published 14 min read

Crypto Hacks Database: Every Major Exploit Since 2025

Quick answer. Guardian counts 41 crypto hacks of $10 million or more from January 2025 to November 10, 2026, worth $10.58 billion. Binance and Bybit are the largest. Offchain attacks on keys, infrastructure and frontends took 91% of it.

Watch: Crypto Hacks Database: Every Major Exploit Since 2025 1:46
Video transcript

Most stolen crypto did not leave through a smart contract bug. It left through keys, signers and infrastructure.

Guardian counts 41 crypto hacks of 10 million dollars or more from January 2025 to November 10, 2026. Together they are worth 10.58 billion dollars. Binance and Bybit are the largest.

Stolen keys, signers, hot wallets and cloud access took three quarters of the value. Frontend and supply chain attacks took another 15 percent. Contract and protocol bugs were just 7 percent.

Offchain attacks took 91 percent of the value, across 29 of the 41 incidents. Take out Binance, and the offchain share is still 78 percent.

The ten largest incidents total 9.62 billion dollars. Exchanges dominate, with Binance, Bybit and Bitget hit through signing systems or wallet infrastructure. Bugs in node or contract code hit Liquid Network, Cetus and Balancer. COLDCARD wallets lost funds to weak seeds.

If you are hit, work in order. Contain the damage, then ask exchanges and issuers for freezes. Open a channel to the attacker, and finally publish a post-mortem.

Guardian's OpSec audit reviews the keys, signing procedures and access that protect your funds. Managed Security monitors contracts on every block, and watches domains, DNS and cloud. When something fires, a Guardian engineer responds.

Read the full database to search every incident and download the CSV. Or talk to Guardian at guardian.security.

This is a list of crypto hacks you can search, filter and download.

It covers every hack, exploit or theft of $10 million or more since January 1, 2025. It also keeps smaller incidents that Guardian has explained.

We built it from the sources ourselves: the victim's own statement first, then reputable reporting and named research. Every row names whose loss figure it shows.

For analysis, read our crypto hack statistics, the biggest hacks of 2026 and onchain vs offchain losses. This page is the full list.

How to Use the Database

  1. Search for a project, chain or technique, such as Solana or oracle.
  2. Filter by year, by category, or to $10M+ or explainer rows.
  3. Sort newest first, or by the largest loss.
  4. Download the CSV, with recoveries, attribution and every source link.

Each column means one thing:

  • Date: the UTC day the exploit began, where a source gives the time.
  • Loss: the value at the time of theft, before any recovery. The line below names whose figure it is.
  • Range: two credible figures that differ by more than 10%, with both sources named.
  • Category and technique: our category, and one line on how the attack worked.
  • Source: the first sources we read. The CSV lists all of them.

The five categories

  • Onchain: a bug in contract, protocol, bridge or node code.
  • Offchain, keys: stolen keys, signers, hot wallets, cloud access, insiders and staff devices.
  • Offchain, frontend: websites, DNS, packages, extensions and tampered hardware.
  • Economic: price, oracle or governance manipulation.
  • Other: the cause is unknown or fits none of these.

We file by root cause where the victim or its investigators state it, and by mechanism where they do not.

So Kelp DAO is offchain: its attacker poisoned the RPC nodes its verifier read from. Drift is offchain too, because its signers pre-signed the takeover.

What the Data Shows

These totals cover the incidents of $10 million or more in Guardian's dataset.

  • $2.29 billion across 18 incidents in 2025. Bybit is 61% of it.
  • $8.28 billion across 23 incidents in 2026 so far. Binance is 77%.
  • $1.94 billion is 2026 without Binance.
  • 91% of the value came from the ten largest incidents.
  • $32 million is the median incident of $10 million or more.

Offchain takes the money

CategoryIncidentsLossShare
Onchain: contract or protocol bug9$788M7%
Offchain: keys, infrastructure and access25$8.08B76%
Offchain: frontend, DNS and supply chain4$1.55B15%
Economic or oracle manipulation3$151M1%

Offchain attacks took 91% of the value, across 29 of the 41 incidents. Without Binance, the offchain share is still 78%.

Contract and protocol bugs were 9 incidents and 7% of the value. Liquid Network, Cetus and Balancer were the largest.

Centralized exchanges were hit hardest. Binance, Bybit and Bitget alone lost more than $8 billion between them.

How it compares

TRM Labs put 2026 hacking at $8.7 billion year to date on October 30, the highest on record. Our 2026 incidents of $10 million or more come to $8.28 billion.

Chainalysis counts over $3.4 billion stolen from January to early December 2025. Our 2025 total is $2.29 billion.

The gap is the long tail: smaller hacks, and thefts from individuals, which this list leaves out. Our guide to why crypto hack reports disagree covers the rest.

The Ten Largest Incidents

The ten largest since January 2025 total $9.62 billion.

  • Exchanges: Binance, Bybit and Bitget, all through signing systems or wallet infrastructure.
  • Code: Liquid Network, Cetus and Balancer, each a bug in node or contract code.
  • Wallets: COLDCARD's weak seeds, with tampered Ledger devices in 12th place.
#IncidentDateLossCategory
1BinanceOct 29, 2026$6.34BOffchain: keys
2BybitFeb 21, 2025$1.4BOffchain: frontend
3BitgetSep 24, 2026$388MOffchain: keys
4Liquid NetworkSep 6, 2026$320MOnchain
5DriftApr 1, 2026$296MOffchain: keys
6Kelp DAOApr 18, 2026$292MOffchain: keys
7CetusMay 22, 2025$223M to $260MOnchain
8Balancer V2Nov 3, 2025$110M to $129MOnchain
9TectonicAug 30, 2026$75M to $120MEconomic
10COLDCARD walletsJul 30, 2026$112MOffchain: keys

All figures are values at the time of theft, before freezes, returns or cover. Each incident's row in the full list names whose figure it is.

Some money comes back. Binance says about $2.85 billion of its loss was frozen or intercepted.

At Tectonic, Cronos rolled its chain back and reversed about $111.2 million. Our report on stolen crypto recovery rates covers the rest.

What to Do If You Are Hit

Speed decides what can still be frozen. Work through these in order.

  1. Contain. Pause contracts, revoke keys and pull a compromised front end. Our incident response plan sets the roles.
  2. Ask for freezes. Send exchanges and issuers the addresses, hashes, amounts and a UTC timeline. See how to request an exchange freeze.
  3. Open a channel. An onchain message can offer the attacker a bounty for returning the rest. Read how to negotiate with a hacker first.
  4. Publish a post-mortem. Timeline, root cause, funds lost and recovered, and fixes. Use our post-mortem template.

Most of the money on this list left through keys, signers and infrastructure. Guardian's OpSec audit reviews the keys, signing procedures, access permissions and team processes that protect your funds.

Guardian's Managed Security monitors contracts on every block for privileged calls, upgrades, multisig transactions and large fund movements.

Offchain, it watches domains, DNS, certificates, cloud and code host. When something fires, a Guardian engineer responds.

To follow incidents as they break, see how to track crypto hacks in real time.

The Full List

50 incidents from January 1, 2025 to November 10, 2026, newest first.

DateProject and chainsLoss (USD)Category and techniqueGuardian explainerSource
Keplr (Web3Auth logins)
Cosmos Hub, Injective
$6M
Bitquery, via The Block
Offchain: keys
Flaw in Web3Auth's embedded-wallet service exposed private keys of Google/Apple-login Keplr wallets
ExplainerThe Block, MetaMask Builder forum
Mercado Bitcoin
Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana +2
$40M to $48.6M
Hypernative, via Decrypt; Bitquery, via CoinDesk
Offchain: keys
Intruder in exchange systems swept hot and customer deposit wallets across ten chains
CoinDesk, Decrypt
Polymarket$2.7M
Polymarket
Offchain: frontend
Compromised third-party monitoring script used live sessions to sell positions and withdraw
ExplainerPolymarket, The Record
Binance
Ethereum, Bitcoin, Tron +7
$6.34B
Binance
Offchain: keys
Compromised DevOps access abused internal signing service and EIP-7702 delegation to drain hot wallets
ExplainerBinance, BleepingComputer
Predict.fun
BNB Chain
$400K
Predict.fun
Offchain: frontend
Suspected compromise of third-party-hosted API documentation site led to user wallet drains
Explainercrypto.news, BeInCrypto
CoinDCX
TRON
$16M
CoinDCX
Offchain: keys
Attackers drained retired deposit wallets compromised in the exchange's 2025 breach
Decrypt, The Block
Ledger devices (reseller implants)
Ethereum, TRON, Bitcoin
$71.5M to $86M
Arkham, via Gizmodo; Specter, via Decrypt
Offchain: frontend
Genuine devices fitted with seed-capturing implants and resold via a Southeast Asian reseller
Ledger, Decrypt
NEAR Intents
BNB Smart Chain
$3.8M
The Block
Onchain
Bug in Omni deposit/withdrawal infrastructure interaction with the Intents contract drained funds
ExplainerThe Block, Cointelegraph
Bitget
Ethereum, XRP Ledger, Zcash +8
$388M
Bitget
Offchain: keys
Third-party security product zero-day gave credentials to inject forged hot-wallet withdrawals
Bitget, CNBC
Liquid Network
Liquid, Bitcoin
$320M
The Block
Onchain
Rangeproof cache-key collision skipped verification, minting unbacked LBTC redeemed for BTC
ExplainerBlockstream, The Block
Tectonic
Cronos
$75M to $120M
CoinDesk, early estimate; Cronos
Economic
Pumped thin TONIC collateral price, then borrowed out nine lending markets
Cointelegraph, CoinDesk
TAC
TAC
$7.5M
Protos
Onchain
Cosmos EVM balance underflow/overflow bug via vesting account and staking precompile
ExplainerCosmos, Protos
KiiChain
KiiChain
$1.6M to $9M
Cosmos post-mortem, realized; Protos
Onchain
Cosmos EVM balance underflow/overflow bug repeated 18 times to drain KII
ExplainerCosmos, BeInCrypto
MANTRA Chain
MANTRA Chain
$3.6M
PeckShield, via crypto.news
Onchain
Cosmos EVM balance underflow/overflow bug via vesting account and staking precompile
ExplainerCosmos, CoinDesk
COLDCARD wallets
Bitcoin
$112M
Galaxy Research, via Cointelegraph
Offchain: keys
Firmware fallback produced weak seeds that attackers regenerated offline and swept
Cointelegraph, Coinkite
Triple-A
Ethereum, TRON, Polygon +4
$11.8M
Specter, via BankInfoSecurity
Offchain: keys
Payment firm's hot wallets compromised and swept across several chains for over a day
Triple-A, BankInfoSecurity
AFX Trade
Arbitrum
$24.1M
Blockaid, via CoinDesk
Offchain: keys
Compromised hot validator keys met bridge quorum and signed an illicit withdrawal
CoinDesk, Cointelegraph
Ostium
Arbitrum
$18M to $23.8M
Blockaid, via CoinDesk, early; BleepingComputer
Offchain: keys
Compromised oracle-signer access used to post future-dated prices and drain the LP vault
BleepingComputer, CoinDesk
BonkDAO
Solana
$20M
BonkDAO
Economic
Attacker bought quorum-sized voting power and passed a malicious proposal draining the treasury
CoinDesk, Cointelegraph
Humanity Protocol
Ethereum, BNB Chain
$32M to $36M
CoinDesk; Halborn
Offchain: keys
Developer-machine malware exposed seven backed-up admin and Safe keys; bridge drained, tokens minted
Humanity Protocol, CoinDesk
Verus-Ethereum Bridge
Ethereum
$11.5M
Blockaid, via crypto.news
Onchain
Forged cross-chain import passed because bridge never checked input amount against payouts
crypto.news, Incrypted
THORChain$10.7M
THORChain
Onchain
Malicious validator exploited GG20 TSS library flaws to leak and rebuild a vault key
ExplainerTHORChain
Kelp DAO
Ethereum
$292M
CoinDesk
Offchain: keys
Poisoned RPC nodes plus DDoS made a 1-of-1 DVN verify a forged rsETH release
ExplainerCoinDesk, LayerZero
Grinex
Tron, Ethereum
$13M to $15M
Halborn; TRM Labs
Offchain: keys
Exchange wallets drained, mostly TRON USDT swapped to TRX and consolidated
TRM Labs, Halborn
CoW Swap$1.2M
CoW DAO
Offchain: frontend
Social engineering at registrar Gandi let attackers hijack cow.fi and serve a wallet-draining phishing site
ExplainerCoW DAO forum, Cointelegraph
Drift
Solana
$296M
Drift
Offchain: keys
Socially engineered Security Council pre-signed durable-nonce admin takeover; fake collateral drained vaults
ExplainerDrift, Chainalysis
Resolv
Ethereum
$25M
Resolv
Offchain: keys
Stolen GitHub/cloud credentials gave attacker signing authority to mint 80M unbacked USR
ExplainerResolv, The Block
YieldBlox pool on Blend
Stellar
$10.2M
Halborn
Economic
Single thin-market trade pushed USTRY oracle price ~100x, enabling over-borrowing against it
The Block, Cointelegraph
Step Finance
Solana
$28.9M to $40M
CertiK, via BleepingComputer; Step Finance
Offchain: keys
Attackers compromised executives' devices and drained treasury wallets, unstaking 261,854 SOL
BleepingComputer, Cointelegraph
SwapNet (Matcha Meta)
Base
$13.3M
Matcha Meta
Onchain
Arbitrary call in the SwapNet router let attacker spend users' standing approvals
Cointelegraph, Nominis
Truebit
Ethereum
$26.6M
Lookonchain, via The Block
Onchain
Flawed pricing in a five-year-old mint contract let attacker buy TRU cheaply for ETH
ExplainerThe Block
Trust Wallet extension$7M to $8.5M
BleepingComputer; Trust Wallet
Offchain: frontend
Tampered extension v2.68, published with a leaked Chrome Web Store key, stole seed phrases
ExplainerTrust Wallet, BleepingComputer
Upbit
Solana
$30.4M to $36M
Upbit; Upbit, first estimate
Offchain: keys
Hot-wallet withdrawals of Solana assets to an address the exchange had not designated
ExplainerUpbit, Decrypt
Balancer V2
Ethereum, Base, Avalanche +6
$110M to $129M
CoinDesk, early; The Block
Onchain
Rounding error in batchSwap EXACT_OUT scaling let the attacker manipulate stable pool invariants
ExplainerThe Block, Balancer forum
Garden Finance$11.4M
Garden Finance
Offchain: keys
Leaked private key on a compromised device let attacker drain one solver's funds
Garden Finance, The Register
SBI Crypto
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin +2
$21M
ZachXBT, via CoinDesk
Offchain: keys
Unauthorized outflows drained the mining firm's own wallets across five chains
SBI Holdings, CoinDesk
SwissBorg (Kiln API)
Solana
$41.5M
CoinDesk
Offchain: frontend
Malicious payload injected into staking partner Kiln's API hijacked an unstake transaction
ExplainerSwissBorg, Kiln
BtcTurk
Ethereum, Avalanche, Arbitrum +4
$48M
Cyvers, via The Block
Offchain: keys
Unauthorized multi-chain outflows from the exchange's hot wallets
The Block, Cointelegraph
WOO X
Arbitrum, Bitcoin, BNB Chain +2
$12M to $14M
PeckShield, via The Block; The Block
Offchain: keys
Unauthorized withdrawals from nine customer accounts after a phishing compromise
The Block, Cointelegraph
CoinDCX
Ethereum, Solana
$44M
The Block
Offchain: keys
Fake job offer planted malware on an engineer's laptop; stolen credentials drained an internal account
The Block, Cointelegraph
BigONE
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana +1
$27M
The Block
Offchain: frontend
Supply chain attack altered account and risk-control servers to approve hot-wallet withdrawals
ExplainerThe Block, Cointelegraph
GMX V1
Arbitrum
$42M
The Block
Onchain
Reentrancy in the V1 GLP pool let the attacker skew short prices and GLP value
The Block, Cointelegraph
Nobitex
Tron, EVM-compatible chains
$90M
The Block
Offchain: keys
Intruders accessed exchange infrastructure and hot wallets, sending funds to unspendable vanity addresses
The Block, Elliptic
Cork Protocol
Ethereum
$12M
The Block
Onchain
Missing authorization in Uniswap V4 hook let attacker mint fake market tokens and redeem wstETH
Cork, The Block
Cetus
Sui
$223M to $260M
Cetus; Lookonchain, via The Block
Onchain
Flawed overflow check in a math library let the attacker mint huge liquidity for dust
ExplainerThe Block, Cointelegraph
BitoPro
Tron, Ethereum, Solana +1
$11.5M
ZachXBT, via The Block
Offchain: keys
Hot wallets drained during a wallet system upgrade and asset transfer; method undisclosed
The Block
Infini
Ethereum
$49M
The Block
Offchain: keys
Attacker who had kept admin privileges on the vault contract changed its settings and drained it
The Block, Halborn
Bybit
Ethereum
$1.4B
Bybit
Offchain: frontend
Malicious JavaScript in Safe's AWS bucket altered a cold-wallet transaction that signers approved
ExplainerFBI IC3, The Block
Phemex
Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base +10
$70M to $85M
The Block; The Block, Feb 19
Offchain: keys
Attackers drained exchange hot wallets across many chains, swapping freezable stablecoins first
The Block, Phemex

Get every row as a CSV file. It adds every chain, recoveries, attribution and all sources.

Explainers for Earlier Incidents

Guardian has also explained these incidents from before 2025.

  • October 2024: Radiant Capital. Malware swapped transactions developers signed.
  • Jul 18, 2024: WazirX. Multisig signers approved a different transaction than shown.
  • Dec 31, 2023: Orbit Bridge. Ethereum vault drained; cause unconfirmed.
  • December 2023: Ledger Connect Kit. Phished npm account shipped a wallet drainer.
  • Sep 23, 2023: Mixin Network. Cloud provider database breached.
  • 2023: Tornado Cash governance. Metamorphic contract took over governance.
  • December 2022: 3Commas. Leaked exchange API keys used to trade.
  • Sep 20, 2022: Wintermute. Hot wallet key likely broken via Profanity.
  • Aug 9, 2022: Curve. DNS hijack sent users to a clone.
  • June 2022: Harmony Horizon bridge. Two compromised keys were enough to sign.
  • March 2022: Ronin bridge. Five of nine validator keys used.
  • January 2022: Crypto.com. Withdrawals passed without 2FA.
  • Dec 2, 2021: BadgerDAO. Injected script requested malicious approvals.
  • June 2020: Ledger customer data. API key exposed an e-commerce database.
  • August 2016: Bitfinex. Attacker inside the network moved 119,754 BTC.

These smaller incidents since 2024 sit outside the table. Most are supply chain attacks.

For the all-time ranking, see the biggest crypto hacks of all time.

Methodology

Scope

  • Included: hacks, exploits and thefts at protocols, exchanges, bridges, chains, wallets and firms.
  • Threshold: a reported loss of $10 million or more, from January 1, 2025.
  • Smaller rows: only incidents Guardian has written an explainer on.
  • Left out: thefts from private individuals, rug pulls, frauds, trading losses and data breaches with no theft figure.
  • Paper losses: left out where a project's own tokens were returned or mostly never sold.

We also leave out incidents we could not confirm in a source we trust.

Sources

Every field comes from a source we read. The victim's post-mortem or statement comes first.

Next come outlets such as The Block, CoinDesk, Cointelegraph and Decrypt. Then named research from firms such as TRM Labs, Chainalysis, Elliptic, CertiK and Halborn.

We do not copy rows, figures or labels from other hacks databases. Categories and technique lines are our own.

Disagreements

Where two credible figures differ by more than 10%, the row shows the range and names both sources.

Otherwise it shows one figure, the victim's where there is one. Dates are UTC where a source gives the time; otherwise they are the date the source reports.

Updates and revisions

We update the database monthly. This version runs to November 10, 2026.

Figures are as reported, and they are often revised as investigations finish. A row can change between versions.

The CSV is free under the CC BY 4.0 license. Credit the Guardian Crypto Hacks Database.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the biggest crypto hack ever?

Binance, on October 29, 2026. Binance puts the assets taken at about $6.34 billion, and TRM Labs counts about $6.36 billion, calling it the largest hack in history. The FBI has linked it to North Korea's TraderTraitor group.

Who is behind most of the money stolen?

North Korea, by the main research firms' counts. TRM Labs says North Korea is responsible for 85% of the value hacked in 2026, as of October. Chainalysis says North Korean hackers stole at least $2.02 billion in 2025.

Does the list include individuals whose wallets were drained?

No. It covers organizations and products. Chainalysis counted $713 million stolen from individual victims in 2025, so its totals run higher. If your own wallet was drained, start with our first-hour guide.

Can I reuse this data?

Yes. The CSV is licensed CC BY 4.0. You may copy, adapt and republish it, including commercially, if you credit the Guardian Crypto Hacks Database and link to this page. Each row's sources keep their own rights.

Sources

Every row's sources are linked in the table and listed in full in the CSV. The page text draws on these:

Hear about your own incident first

Guardian watches your contracts on every block and your domains, DNS and cloud offchain, with an engineer on every alert.